Few months ago, I almost never used draft PR. Because I reviewed the diff and wrote the description before submitting it. But with coding agents, I decided to always create PR as draft. My role is to self-review the PR before asking for a review. It's also useful to fix the CI…
Commit
3613aa2
maybe someday, PR will refer to "Prompt Request", and the diff will be the prompts that led to the artifact.. crazy times
Reusing this acronym works. For now, it's more of a series of interactions to achieve a result than something that generates the perfect code in a single prompt.
yes, and those interactions could be the diff :) git will track the intent/spec in human language
You mean, 1 commit per prompt. And we prompt directly from GitHub PR UI. Why not. It will have to be a lot more responsive.
commit 3613aa2