replying to @dtinth
Shape I'm picturing: a Bun CLI you run in the vault under pitchfork. It indexes the .md, serves a web backoffice, commits+pushes with a GitHub App token, and publishes to Supabase on save. Q: always-on box or laptop?
Commit
46052d4
Always-on box. I have a VPS running Dokploy btw.
Then Dokploy could own it: one Bun container, vault = git clone in a volume, GitHub App token pulls/pushes, backoffice behind your existing Supabase login. Keep mise+pitchfork for local dev only, or run it bare on the host?
Still thinking. I mean, I also want to let agents help me with my drafts. In the past I can just run Claude Code on my vault, bare on the VPS. But if it becomes a service, then it introduces indirection. Still weighting tho!
But do you understand the difference between files in…
GitHubGitHub - dtinth/dt.in.th: @dtinth’s digital garden@dtinth’s digital garden. Contribute to dtinth/dt.in.th development by creating an account on GitHub.
I think so. Vault .md = source of truth, private included. publish.ts copies only public notes (plus tree/sitegraph/index/search keys) to Supabase. generate_static_site compiles those rows, caches the result in the row, renders HTML into published/ (dt.in.th repo) and pushes to…
dt.in.thThai Pangsakulyanont
There are unlisted notes too, you understand how they work?
Yes: public: true but not reachable from HomePage. They still go to Supabase (row + search keys, compiled too) but get no static HTML and stay out of tree/index/sitemap. A visit hits 404.html, and the client fetches it via notes_get_contents.
Correct. We can start infra side anew. Let's start anew. Install @mattpocock skills. Put the current checkout in a worktree for reference. And let's get /grilling.
Done: mattpocock-skills plugin installed (user scope), old checkout parked at ./legacy on a
legacy branch. Grilling round 1. Reply "yes" per Q to take my rec.
Q1 Where it runs: bare on the VPS under pitchfork, vault as a plain git checkout so Claude Code can work in it…Q1, Q2, Q3, Q5, Q6. Agree
Q4. Right now publish is all-or-nothing, as in publishing the vault content. Not sure if with the new version, can we can just publish selectively.
Round 2, all on Q4. Selective fits well, because Supabase is already a separate copy: the static site is built from Supabase rows, not from the vault.
Q7 Unit of publish: per note. "Publish" copies that note's current source into its Supabase row, and the row becomes the…
dt.in.thThai Pangsakulyanont
Q7, Q8, 10, 11. Agree
Q9. Still needed.
public: true is the "desired state" so to speak. To unpublish I would set public: false and the back office should slate it for unpublishing.
Btw, by starting anew I mean start a new Git history. On cutover we merge main in with -s…Got it. public: true = desired state, Supabase row = actual state. And the checkout is now on an orphan branch
next, with the old code in ./legacy. At cutover: merge main into next with -s ours, then fast-forward main.
Round 3:
Q12 Reconcile UX: the backoffice shows a plan,…All agree
Round 4, ops and edges:
Q18 GitHub App: one app, installed on the vault repo and dtinth/dt.in.th, with contents read/write only. Its private key and the Supabase service key live in a mise env file outside the vault, so agents working in the vault never see them.
-> Yes.
Q19…
dt.in.thThai Pangsakulyanont
Agree all
Last round, I think:
Q25 Distribution: the CLI is published as a compiled Bun binary on GitHub Releases of this repo, and the vault pins it in mise.toml via the github: backend. pitchfork.toml in the vault runs
notes serve.
-> Yes.
Q26 Cutover check: before switching,…Agree all, but not sure between a binary or a bundled JS file. Bundled JS file with proper shebang looks more portable.
Fair. Bundled JS (bun build --target=bun, #!/usr/bin/env bun, bun via mise), with backoffice assets inlined so it's one file. If shiki wasm won't inline, ship a tarball instead. Writing docs/SPEC.md now.
@dtinth docs/SPEC.md is done, committed as the first commit on (local only). It covers the 3 layers, plan/apply, the frontend contract, sync, secrets and cutover. Push to origin so you can read it there?
Typo fix: the blank above is the branch
next. Spec is the first commit there, local only. Push next to origin?commit 46052d4
Well, you don't have push access right now, so I will have to grant you access. But I will do that later. For now, please work on the local copy.
But are you ready to start prototyping in the meantime? Maybe you can see if you can get Bun building and bundling and compiling to…