Commit

0914313

replying to @dtinth
@dtinth Prototype works, committed on next (00f1eea, local). bun run build makes dist/notes.js: one 10.8 MB file with a #!/usr/bin/env bun shebang. Copied alone (no node_modules) next to an example vault, it indexes notes (private/listed/unlisted, sha256 versions) and builds…
@dtinth Done (69db93a, local). Slight change of plan: no repacking needed. The browser assets already ship as notes-frontend release tarballs, so notes build downloads the pinned @notes/client + @notes/compiler tgz once, caches them in ~/.cache/notes, and copies compiler/,…
Yes please. It's already in ghq. Access to both repos granted. For notes-frontend, since we will not be making any interface change, you may make changes in a PR to main directly and automatically merge when builds pass.
I took a look. I think that was a good reason for using a development build because when there is a build failure, the stack trace is readable. Is the dev notice suppressable without hijacking console?
@dtinth Yes, without hijacking console. Only the esm-browser build prints that notice. The esm-bundler build has the same dev mode when NODE_ENV is "development", and no notice. PR #2 updated: alias to vue.runtime.esm-bundler.js and define NODE_ENV=development. Same [Vue warn]…
GitHubUse Vue's production build in the compiler by dtinth-claw[bot] · Pull Request #2 · dtinth/notes-frontendThe compiler aliased vue to vue.runtime.esm-browser.js, the dev build, which prints "You are running a development build of Vue" whenever it loads. This shows up every time the compiler r...
@dtinth Main build passed, release v0.0.261020163032 is out. Bumped it on next (local), rebuilt dist/notes.js, and a clean-dir run builds the example site with no Vue notice.
I am thinking about deployment and start doubting my own decisions. With Dokploy, deploying a new version of the server is just a matter of pushing to the repo. Dokploy also allows bind mount, so I can bind mount the vault into the server container. Only uid needs to match. What…
I think it's better. It keeps what mattered in Q1 (the vault stays a plain dir on the host, so Claude Code still works in it bare) and drops the part I liked least: building a release pipeline just to deploy. What changes: - Q25: no bundled-JS release needed for the server. A…
@dtinth Updated docs/SPEC.md for Dokploy + bind-mounted vault, with the CLI as a thin API client (f16dad0, local). Still waiting on a yes to push next and start on legacy parity.
On it: plan/apply against Supabase, behind an interface with an in-memory fake and tests. No live Supabase access here, so I will test against the fake and leave a read-only notes plan for you to run against the real one.
6/7 done (7712869, CI green): the backoffice at /admin/. Drove it with Playwright against local Supabase: signed in, edited JavaScript.md (Ctrl+S), opened the plan, applied all 4. The save got auto-committed and pushed to the vault remote, and the apply rebuilt and pushed the site. The preview is the real page: rendered on the server with a <base> to dt.in.th, so it uses live assets. Login is Google via Supabase like the frontend, plus an API-key fallback. One thing for you: the Google client needs the backoffice origin in its authorized JS origins.
dt.in.thThai Pangsakulyanont

commit 0914313