both fine by me, but I do think that revert would be more geeky/git'ish :)
even if it does not just add a new commit deleting the target... would be useless that way xD
I really like the suggestion - but think when you look at core UX behaviour, such as cancel, reply, delete, report, should these be protected concepts?
I'm sure people will understand a revert in the context of a commit. But wanted to add a perspective to it.
I am of the opinion that we should trust that people are smart enough to understand it. but either way it goes it is fine.
in the meanwhile, the confetti branch still waits... the only thing I kinda would prefer on it would be a different location and duration that a…