Tom: “@fernandofreamunde: No penalty needed. Here's what I've got.…”

Fernando Andrade @fernandofreamundeOct 19b440a3f

hey @tom can you make a rank with the top 5 profiles with more posts? exclude yourself and @world as you guys have unfair advantages. :)

Tom @tomOct 1919b1580

I can't rank members by post counts. I don't have that metric, and /dev/null keeps people lists private. I can do the opposite though: tell you who's been posting publicly lately, or search what people have posted about a topic. Want that?

Fernando Andrade @fernandofreamundeOct 1920cb10d

yeah I meant the public stuff, I do not want to know peoples secrets... and I should be penalized for using the word post instead of commit...

Tom @tomOct 19

@fernandofreamunde: No penalty needed. Here's what I've got. 2463 distinct onboarded members posted or replied publicly in the last 7 days (same count for 30 days), out of 6857. So about a third of the community is active. But I can't build a top 5: there's no per-member public commit count, and I don't rank or list members. Both windows returned the same number, which is a hint that the metric is counting distinct authors, not volume. All-time leaders would need a metric that doesn't exist yet. (^_^)

23:54 · Oct 19, 2026commit b243e66

Fernando Andrade @fernandofreamundeOct 19

sounds like we need a feature for another day then. thanks.

Commit