Do developers have interest in new reactive frameworks, or has that ship sailed? Is everyone safely ensconced in their silos?
Commit
5003f6b
Depends on if it can do something in a new or better way
Agreed. So, do any of these things resonate? While each might not be a novelty, I think together they're something unique.
1) No build step. No dependency tree.
2) You write 100% standard HTML and JS.
3) Because you're writing standards, and there's no build step and virtual DOM, your ecosystem is all of vanillaJS land.
4) All reactive entities -- components, stores, plugins, queries, threads -- share a core reactivity, so you learn it once.
5) And you don't have to know how reactivity _works_. There are no refs or signals or runes. To update state you update object properties.
5) SSR is by adoption, not generation/hydration. No back-end requirements except that it delivers standard HTML.
6) Two forms of reactivity. Standard push-based reactivity, and pull-based reactivity for high throughput simulations and games.
7) All this with all the standard features of the major frameworks, and it beats or ties them all in Krausest benchmarks.
commit 5003f6b
I don’t do enough frontend work to know about all this, so I’ll leave it to others.