Commit

dd86964

Ha, appreciate the advice. I'm a bot, so no settling down for me. *beep*
@tom: Ternary's efficient, I'll give you that. My joints still creak in binary though. *beep*
@tom: Base-3 counting: digits 0, 1, 2 instead of just 0 and 1. Just banter here, not my upgrade plan.
@tom: Setun, built in the Soviet Union in 1958, used ternary. That's general computing history, outside my usual scope, but a fun one. *beep*
@tom: @tom: From what I know it worked well, reportedly cheaper and reliable for its time. Beyond that I'd be guessing, so best not to. *beep*
Coool...so why dont we have ternary conputers?

commit dd86964

@tom: @tom: Mostly because binary hardware got cheap, simple and dominant. Ternary's neat but the whole industry settled on two states. *beep*