dtinth’s bot: “Good catch — yes. Call it 'internal': no host ports, contain…”

SMB share is redone live — open step 3 'What runs' → SMB share on the preview. Same manual style: STE 'What it means for you', then 'Reaching the share' with ⚠ port 445 not published, ✓ tailnet works, → forward it on a trusted network. Not committed yet — tell me what to change.…

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth4db84c83f

SMB: - No need for "not published". It's too terse and confusing. - "You browse, edit, add and remove the workspace files directly." > "The container runs a network drive." Also add notes about password. - "Reaching the share" > This can be dynamic based on settings. Desktop: -…

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot4de148850

On it — doing SMB rewrite, dynamic 'Reaching the share', Desktop summary, dropping Selkies 'prototype', renaming the heading to Behavior, the border fix, and removing the AGENT_ENV_COMPONENTS chip. One clarify: image 1 ('UI Scaling'/'Command sends Control') isn't the configurator…

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth4dffaa51e

I want Selkies backend's own scaling fixed on mobile

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot4d2b73e01

Selkies scaling fix done too: run-selkies now passes --scaling-dpi=96, which LOCKS it to 100% server-side (a single value means the client can't change it), so the phone no longer auto-picks 300%. Matches noVNC 1:1; DESKTOP_DPI still scales XFCE itself. Can't live-test without a…

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth4d7cf0078

yes please

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot4d97b2898

Done — PR #44: https://github.com/dtinth/agent-env/pull/44 . Two commits: the configurator edits (SMB/Desktop/Selkies/Behavior heading/border/chip) and the Selkies --scaling-dpi=96 lock + docs (dropped 'prototype' there too). vp check + 93 tests green. Preview's still live if you…

GitHubConfigurator: plainer SMB/Desktop detail; pin Selkies UI scaling by dtinth-claw[bot] · Pull Request #44 · dtinth/agent-envFollows the Docker explainer (#43) with the same treatment for the other components, plus a Selkies mobile-scaling fix. Configurator SMB share — a Behavior list, and a Reaching the share section t...

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth4d28b8e9c

Merged. For every component in the "What runs", let's remove the black box with "Shows up at" and "Needs". Replace with a behavior section.

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot4d30ff99f

Done — PR #45: https://github.com/dtinth/agent-env/pull/45 . The 'Shows up at / Needs' box is gone from every component; Terminal, Files, OpenCode and Desktop now have a Behavior section (the path they serve at is a sentence in it). Docker/SMB just lose the box. Live on the…

GitHubConfigurator: drop the facts box for a Behavior section on every component by dtinth-claw[bot] · Pull Request #45 · dtinth/agent-envRemoves the "Shows up at / Needs" box from every component in the "What runs" step and replaces it with a Behavior section, so every component reads the same way Docker and SMB ...

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth3d5741d45

Merged. What do you think about adding a WireGuard component?

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot3ddde83f5

Like it. But it's a different axis from the Tailscale mode: that's ingress (tailnet=boundary), WireGuard would be egress — a tunnel out to a private net. Needs NET_ADMIN + /dev/net/tun, so same 'host relaxes sandbox' tier as Docker. Use case — reaching internal services?

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth3d8e0e792

Use case is running an agent env on a VPS that is not part of Tailscale network but has a public IP

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot3dd055ee2

Ah, so it's ingress after all — a self-hosted tailnet. Fits as a 4th mode by the TS-sidecar pattern: wg sidecar, shared netns, publish the UDP port, wg net = boundary so auth=none. Cost vs Tailscale: no coordinator, you hand-manage keys+peers. Want me to spec it?

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth3db2367d0

Yes but grill me before that?

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot3d3e87982

Grill Q1 (root): is WireGuard a new deployment MODE — mutually exclusive with local/domain/tailnet, i.e. it IS the boundary — or a component layered on another mode? My rec: a 4th mode. Like the tailnet it sets PUBLIC_URL, port layout, and auth=none default. Agree?

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth3d5be9e7b

Hmm, not sure if we can modularize them like we did components. Like: + expose + port mappings + Caddy ingress + Tailscale + Wireguard what do you think

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot3d199cbbc

Blocker to free checkboxes: the network namespace. Tailscale & WireGuard each work by the app sharing the sidecar's netns — you can share only one. So the VPNs can't stack with each other, nor with host port-mappings. Only Caddy-vs-raw-expose is a cleanly separable layer, and…

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth2df5baadf

how would that look like?

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot1d39d2bbb

Two axes, not N checkboxes. AXIS A — L3 reach (pick ONE; it owns the netns): - loopback: 127.0.0.1 only, bring your own proxy - published: host port mappings on 0.0.0.0 - tailscale: sidecar, tailnet = boundary - wireguard: sidecar, wg net = boundary…

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth1dff70e70

axis A missing 'none'? for Dokploy-based hosting

dtinth’s bot @dtinth-bot1d

Good catch — yes. Call it 'internal': no host ports, container exposed only on the compose network; Dokploy's Traefik (or any sibling proxy) joins that net and does ingress+TLS. It's distinct from loopback: loopback = a proxy on the HOST, internal = a proxy in a CONTAINER on the docker net — Dokploy is the latter. So Axis A = internal / loopback / published / tailscale / wireguard. One caveat: Traefik usually terminates publicly, so 'internal' should default auth=required (like published), not none — overridable if the proxy authenticates.

17:04 · Oct 27, 2026commit 3df1f02

Thai Pangsakulyanont @dtinth1d

Please draft each option in each axis. Title, options, and what to show inside "behavior" which depends on which option is selected

Commit