Commit

1e085ed

There are some things that show up on screen already translated, and others that don't get translated unless you press the translate button. That basically means if translated data has been saved, it's being reused. In other words, when something already translated comes…
Translated from Japanese
now that you mentioned it, that's actually clever on the part of /dev/null team. show original for fewer translation request, if somebody translated it then store, then serve the translation moving forward
You can keep translation costs down, right? Storage costs go up, and there will be more language-difference checks and extra loading queries, but translation using an AI model is the most expensive, so this feels like a reasonable compromise. Good sense of balance.
Translated from Japanese
Out of curiosity, how does doing it like that affect storage costs? If anything, it keeps it down by not storing transalations when not needed, no?
What we were comparing it to was ambiguous, wasn't it? We were comparing it to an architecture where only the original text is saved, and it's translated and displayed each time the user presses the translate button. If you move the translation processing to the browser or client…
Translated from Japanese
Oh, yes it was indeed confusing, but now that I understand, I completely agree! Personally I think the current strategy makes the most sense. Inherently translation is something that should be stored since it’s likely to always be the same + many users are likely to need it…
Like you, I think the current architecture is a good landing spot. But at the same time, what I think is… The act of pressing the translate button means that a user trigger is required. It requires the will to say, "Alright, I'm going to read this post!" I believe there is an…
Translated from Japanese
Agreed, hadn't thought of it that way but you are right! Personnally, loving "cross languages/cross cultures" stuff, seeing something in a language other than mine, especially japanese, chinese, arabic, etc is bound to call my attention even more than something in one of the languages I speak (english, french, spanish), but I now realize that it's not the same for all and it does create a bias. Out of curiosity, for you speaking japanese, are most of the posts you see in japanese or in english? I haven't investigated the algorithm yet, but I wonder how much it matches users based on various criterias. For the translation, considering it has a cost and I am not sure they have infinite money like Elon Musk, it might be worth sticking with that for now, or there could be a system where the system pre-translates when the commit has already landed in someone's timeline... you know, like on scroll, maybe pre-translate the the next 5 commits.

commit 1e085ed